Community > Forum > Freshwater Talk > CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!

CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!

floyd
floyd

Florida,US

Posted Sun Jan 18, 2009 5:21 am
CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!
Guys- Just joined the site and am looking forward to the next LMB tournament. The first thing that caught me off guard on this site were the numerous photos of large mouths that appeared ready for the wall or the frying pan! WTF! Even the profile photos under "favorite bait", there's a guy holding a 6+ indoors and another guy with a 7+ next to his camper. Under latest photos, some clown has the caption "A man's gotta eat" with about a dozen NICE bass lying in his friggn driveway! I see this site is sponsored by the IGFA- I'm sure they would pull their association if this is the norm here. My take is these photos should be policed and punted from the site- along with the donuts who posted them. Help me out on this one guys- thoughts?

floyd

LooseDragMcgoo
LooseDragMcgoo

Ontario,CA

Posted Sun Jan 18, 2009 6:16 am
Re: CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!
But having that attitude... I agree some big fish get eaten..... but by saying this do we not promote lead way for such originizations like PETA to say even anglers say its bad to eat fish.... think about it? I agree selective harvest is in this generation of anglers hands...... We must all work together to promote CPR of big fish that will produce great offspring. The laws our Government's deem on us allow anglers to eat fish and in some cases any size and more numbers then required to have a month's worth of fish at the table...... Should we not be trying to change these laws to help the fishery, it's feedback that will help change things and the more positive it is the longer those laws will stay in place! And in some cases some people do take fish to there home via livewell to get pics and then release when there done, do I agree with this that's a different story and that comes down to an anglers morals. Being new to this site, give this place a month and you will see that 99% of the people here are great people and out to help the fishery! It's great to see the passion you put out! Welcome to bounty!
Mike :)

Better to be loose then tight!

Bassdominator
Bassdominator

Quebec,CA

Posted Sun Jan 18, 2009 6:24 am
Re: CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!
I agree with you in a way, being a bass angler I understand how important catch and release is for the future of fisheries. I would never eat a bass, probably because I know too much about their diets. LOL . When I see people killing a bass, it sickens me a little bit, but I understand that sometimes its the way they put food on the table.
IGFA is an organization that promotes catch and release, but I don't think bounty is here to judge you on if you keep a fish or not. I am looking forward to the comments that I will see following this thread :)

Contact me at : Jonathan@ilivetofish.com

musky55
musky55

Quebec,CA

Posted Sun Jan 18, 2009 7:50 am
Re: CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!
I think the only ?? here are how many do you keep and do you need to show
pictures of 5-6 fish caught on your driveway. I totally beleive in catch and realese
but a nice walleye meal always taste good, I've seen some of these photo's and
thought much the same. I don't think the site is responsible for all the pictures
being shown, but to keep for a supper is not a bad thing.

Rod Earl

BountyAdmin
BountyAdmin

Washington,US

Posted Sun Jan 18, 2009 9:22 am
Re: CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!
Jeff,

Thanks for you interest in Bountyfishing and for your concern for catch and
release. Bounty is a strong supporter of conservation, and in fact
BountyFishings' innovative digital format allows most fish to be caught and
released immediately on-site. Alleviating the need to store and transport
fish in live wells, and be subjected to a weigh-in process.

We also respect state/provincial rules and regulations and feel that the
harvest of fish is not against the law and an important part of the fishing
experience for many anglers.

As I'm sure you recognize just because a photo is taken with a lake in the
background does not prevent someone from later eating the fish. Likewise,
you will find once you get to know some of those top anglers, that a good
number of those fish in the photos were in fact later released. Like
yourself, anglers who tend to be very good, also carry a tremendous amount
of respect for the resource and for big fish in particular.

Over the course of BountyFishings short history we have disallowed many fish
which have shown signs of mishandling, but as long as the fish is in good
health and still alive when the photo is taken it is eligible for entry.

Thanks again for you feedback. We are always looking for ways to make the
BountyFishing experience better, and appeal to the greatest cross section of
anglers possible.

The Bounty Admin - info@BountyFishing.com

nidahobassin
nidahobassin

Idaho,US

Posted Thu Jul 2, 2009 9:45 am
Re: Re: CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!
" but as long as the fish is in good
health and still alive when the photo is taken it is eligible for entry."

I would like to direct your attention to the dead fish in the photo from last week's Largemouth winner. Notice the discoloration on the tail and gill plate from being dead for quite a while. Also, Largemouth do not have yellow eyes(unless the lay dead in warm water).

Tony McCalmant www.baitsmith.com www.proangler.com

freshwaterphi
freshwaterphi

Quebec,CA

Posted Sun Jan 18, 2009 9:48 am
Re: CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!
Nothing wrong with people eating bass as long as they are coming from clean water, they taste good. Their diets are similar to pike, perch and walleye, I have gutted some from all species, the stomach contents are often similar. By Bounty allowing pics of proud anglers bragging with their catches, they are accomodating everyone, namely people who fish for sport as well as those that eat their catch.

As far as conserving trophies, local regulations should protect trophy sized fish in all species. Instead, they often protect only smaller fish as is the case with muskies, which is a huge mistake in my opinion. Recently Ontario got a bit smarter and rediced the slot limit on large walleyes to only 1 fish.

Let us all remember that humans have been eating fish for thousands of years. Catch and release is a very recent invention. Once upon a time, anyone that released a fish would likely have been sent to the insane asylum.

Furthermore, catching a fish just to release it dosn't make anyone morally better than one that keeps some for the table. Do you think the fish enjoy being hooked, fought, taken out of the water, flapping around a boat or shore, and being weighed?

Freshwaterphil.com

Jratthelake
Jratthelake

Ontario,CA

Posted Sun Jan 18, 2009 10:05 am
Re: CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!
Catch and release is great, and selective harvest is important when when planning a fish fry. I said it before here... I think any fish caught while fishing Bounty tournys should be released, just like ANY other tournament format out there. We should be proud to release our Bounty Trophies. And I agree, no more garage or front lawn photos, take your picture on the lake and release the fish, why would you take the fish home and release it later, I cant imagine carting fish around in a livewell or cooler is good for the fish.

Wayne Papp JR http://www.witchbay.com/fishrpt.htm

huntkilleatrepeat
huntkilleatrepeat

Illinois,US

Posted Sun Jan 18, 2009 12:37 pm
Re: CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!
Catch and release is not a bad thing. Neither is keeping some for the table. Like its been said already, eating fish has been going on forever. Why should it stop now. Sure, if you catch a trophy bass, let it go for the next guy. But if you catch, say, a stringer full of legal minimums, throw 'em in the grease. Whichever side your on look at it this way, as great a country America is, there are still people that don't get enough food, so a fish caught, is a fish eaten. However the vast majority of us don't rely on our fishing prowess to eat. So throw some back. Don't forget about all the fun it is to catch a fish. Take this how you will, just my two cents.

I had to work to be the jerk I've come to be, it ain't easy bein' me. Chris Knight

floyd
floyd

Florida,US

Posted Sun Jan 18, 2009 12:53 pm
Re: CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!
Great feedback guys- much appreciated and I have added many of you to my friends list. Just to clarify, it's primarily the species of Large Mouth Bass that I am particularly protective of- that's the thrust of my catch and release rant. Trust me, being from the midwest, I've snacked on my share of walleye, crappie, and especially catfish. Call me crazy, I just feel like eating a LMB parallels to eating an osprey, hawk, or eagle...

Good luck on the water!

floyd

P.S. One luxury of living in a new area of Orlando, I've had the honor and privlege of moving fingerlings from over populated areas into new (but established) retention waters. Some of the bass seen in my photos were moved to that pond 4 years ago by your's truly :)

floyd

freshwaterphi
freshwaterphi

Quebec,CA

Posted Tue Jan 20, 2009 8:48 am
Re: Re: CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!
Interesting point of view, why is it that people have no problem eating some gamefish such as walleye or pike, but frown on others eating bass?

In most areas I fish, bass largely outnumber the other game fish species, so in theory, people should have more of a problem with walleye eaters than bass eaters.

I realize the bass fishing culture in the USA is different than in Canada, but as long as bag limits are in effect and bass aren't endangered, people should have them option of keeping them without being ostracized.

In regards to moving fingerlings, that "honor" would get you a hefty fine here in Canada, it is illegal. Again, I realize you live in the US and I'm sure it's totally legal there, just pointing out some differences in our fishing cultures.

Freshwaterphil.com

Steve P
Steve P

Florida,US

Posted Mon Jan 19, 2009 6:11 am
Re: CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!
Guys in tournys keep there fish in a live well all day with proper care, bringing the fish home in a live well to photo is no different then you taking those fingerlings to another lake,which i would find handling those delicate little fish unessecary!I myself fish by myself and i have invested time and money to ensure my fish remain alive, in 20 tourys i have only lost 3 fish and they were promtly eaten(not me,allergic to fish) I do not like the pics with any game fish are killed or eaten but they are food fish! just use sense and moderation,its good to see compashion for the fish!!!!!!!!!!

Thumper!! S papp

FISHINMA
FISHINMA

Utah,US

Posted Mon Jan 19, 2009 6:34 pm
Re: CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!
Floyd there has been MANY threads on Bounty dealing with your concerns! YOUR concerns have the support of the majority of us since Bounty started in Spring of 2007! You must go back into past posts there's ALOT of SUPER feed back on your issues! Welcome and remember...SMILES ALWAYS!

MA

Delawarebass
Delawarebass

Delaware,US

Posted Fri Mar 27, 2009 5:44 am
Re: CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!
I personally don't like to see photos of bass that are in driveways or in homes, I think it looks tacky, but there are times when you should keep some bass depending on the lake. There are certain lakes that benefit from anglers taking a certain size fish, but to be honest, most bass in the US are not really safe to eat. They contain levels of PCB and Methyl Mercury that are way too high for me!! In Delaware the consumption of most freshwater fish is advised not to exceed 8 ounces a month for an adult. If the government advises that, how safe do you really think it is??

Tight lines, Steve

Northeast Bass Fishing For Trophy Bass

Igor
Igor

Ontario,CA

Posted Fri Mar 27, 2009 2:10 pm
Re: CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!
I agree and had have the same thoughts pics look better with a lake or treeline in it instead of a driveway or house even when I am out there I will most of the time look around to get the best landscape in the background..eat smaller fish it has less impact comes back quicker and tastes better..but I live and fish clean waters inland lakes of northern ontario and even then there are certain lakes I wont eat from..practice catch and release but really its morals and ethics that play the part..if I kill,or even injure a nice fish it makes me feel bad,guilt not sur what but not good and the opposite occurs when we take some nice pics of a nice fish and release her without incident..so release a nice fish and feel what we are talking about ..
and make better pics

fish on...

Jratthelake
Jratthelake

Ontario,CA

Posted Sat Mar 28, 2009 5:18 am
Re: CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!
Those that are concerned should go through the Bounty photos and rate them. Could get a pretty good idea of what the community wants to see.

Wayne Papp JR http://www.witchbay.com/fishrpt.htm

LooseDragMcgoo
LooseDragMcgoo

Ontario,CA

Posted Sat Mar 28, 2009 5:49 am
Re: CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!
Ya but dont jump to assumptions on peoples photos..... message the person try to find out more facts on why the pic was taken at home....... gets sickening seeing a bunch of people jump on a person over a photo at home when they are within the regs and laws..... You are barking up the wrong tree!!!! That last team tourny I got a walleye which was actaully only the third walleye Id caught this year, the other 2 went back but I like to eat walleye and I wanted a picture with my son and couldnt take him on the ice!
It's good to take pics and release asap I agree with that part. But some fish do get kept for table fare in this tough economic time! I dont blame some people for taking a fish home take picture then fillet and eat it!!!! The ones that kinda boggle me are the one's that say I had to take it home get pics and then I took it back to the lake to release it..... that's alot of wasted time for the purpose of proof of catching it! You know deep down inside you caught it and that's all that should matter! Good to see that you guys care but try not to be offensive towards members that do take pics at home, that kinda reflects bad on the community as well in my opinion. it should be cleared up like alot of personal or conflict issues on here, either through PM or via email.......Not cool to single people out on here and I have saw it and it is not right......
Mike :)

Better to be loose then tight!

Jratthelake
Jratthelake

Ontario,CA

Posted Sat Mar 28, 2009 6:40 am
Re: CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!
Good points, after looking through a lot of photos I found only a handfull of photos that I would call offensive. I totally agree this should not be a witch hunt but more an avenue to clean up the photo album a bit. I am not offended by the guy who transports a fish , takes pictures and releases it, I dont understand it but I am not offended. I am offended by Bloody heaping piles of fish....and dead or misshandled trophy fish.

Wayne Papp JR http://www.witchbay.com/fishrpt.htm

freshwaterphi
freshwaterphi

Quebec,CA

Posted Sun Mar 29, 2009 8:30 am
Re: Re: CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!
I guess you don't go to the fish store too often, tons of trophy fish sitting on ice there, including giant wild salmon, big walleyes, wild chars, monster stipers, etc.

That being said, a sport fishing community site such as this one isn't the best place to brag about all the ones you decided to keep by posting those pics of just tons of dead fish. I sometimes wonder if these guys have room to eat anything else based on the numbers of fish in those pics.

One more thing for those deciding to release fish after taking them home: Unless you live on the water body you're fishing, every minute out of the water sitting on a driverway, reduces the fish's chance of survival dramatically. Chances are, you killed the fish anyway, you might as well eat it. Furthermore, transporting live fish in some provinces (and probably states) is illegal.

Freshwaterphil.com

Jratthelake
Jratthelake

Ontario,CA

Posted Sun Mar 29, 2009 8:36 am
Re: Re: Re: CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!
I wont buy fish from the grocery store or order it in a restaurant.

Wayne Papp JR http://www.witchbay.com/fishrpt.htm

freshwaterphi
freshwaterphi

Quebec,CA

Posted Sun Mar 29, 2009 12:23 pm
Re: Re: Re: Re: CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!
I don't blame you, I feel the same way. Their fish have been sitting on ice for days, God only knows where they came from. Nothing like fresh caught fish.

Freshwaterphil.com

RaiderNation
RaiderNation

California,US

Posted Sun Mar 29, 2009 7:57 am
Re: CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!
I support catch and release for Largemouth bass. Especially lakes that are self-sustained and do not get stocked with any fish at all. Good post Floyd. I do see what you mean on some of these pics people send in.

Always fish like its the last day of your life...

rajunkajun
rajunkajun

Texas,US

Posted Fri May 1, 2009 12:29 pm
Re: CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!
I use to keep the LMB, until I got really into it. Now I always release, as for whites, and crappie, well I sure will keep those guys. They're a lot better tasting than a LMB, besides I've come to look at LMB fishing as a sport, and if we always take the big ones, what's gonna be left for the next guy or next year for that matter.

Boat'em

MTfishingrods
MTfishingrods

Montana,US

Posted Mon May 4, 2009 6:08 pm
Re: CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!
Whether or not my son and I keep a fish or release it is decided mainly upon where we are fishing and what we are fishing for. I fish many more days than the average angler on several lakes around this area and thought I was doing my part by catching and releasing almost all the pike we caught. After several surveys and boat checks conducted by fish and game they actually said they preferred that me and a couple three others that fished this particular lake kept more fish. They were over populated and needed to be kept in check somehow. They had also been illegally introduced here in the first place. I know this may not apply to Bass or lakes near you, but we shouldnt be so quick to judge others if they have kept fish that are legal to do so. The laws are there for a reason. If your fisheries cant handle that kind of harvest then your local fisheries mangers will lower the limits or make it straight catch and release only. We have many waters in our state that are catch and release only. Maybe the guy who kept the dozen Bass in his driveway, released all the rest of his fish the remaining year. Would that make a difference to anyone? Realisticly it probably didnt happen, but who knows. We dont. We cant force our opinions on them either. By seeing a thread like this they will just get defensive and stop showing the photos. It wont change their actions. They need to be educated on their specific bodies of water and species of fish. I know I had to be. Even when I thought I was doing it right.

www.montanafishingrods.com

Bigeyes
Bigeyes

Minnesota,US

Posted Tue May 5, 2009 10:19 am
Re: CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!
I eat Fish!!!!!!!! I actually had fish 4 times last week and leftovers for lunch. It is crappie season (actually it doesn't close) here in Minnesota and we are catching some nice crappie and sunfish. I would fish everyday if I could and bring home a meal most days I go out. There is nothing wrong with eating what you catch. As for bass, I personally don't like to clean or eat them. My grandparents love them. When I catch bass earlier in the season I will usually keep a couple to bring them a nice meal. I never keep anything over 2 lbs as that seems to be the border line where the meet starts getting softer. I have thrown my share of trophies (at least by Minnesota standards) back to. It is not uncommon for me to catch 3 or 4 fish over 5 lbs in a day and I have many days where I catch 50 or more fish. It all comes down to being selective and being educated. I am sure there are people on here just like everywhere that have never been taught the difference. They may have never been shown the difference between the meat in big fish and smaller fish. We are a grandiose society and big is impressive.

I have caught my share of large fish and even very large fish. I watched my grandpa fillet the first walleye I eve caught over 8 lbs and couldn't understand why his were on the wall and mine was in the frying pan. When you are 5, that is a tough concept. But he was brought up in a time that fish was for food and it was an affordable source of meat for the family. I was brought up that way too but have since developed my own fishing philosophy. I know I can go catch larger fish than most people. I know I can go catch more fish than most people. I don't really care about that. I have caught 17 inch Crappies, 30+ inch walleyes, 40 inch pike, 53 inch muskies and bass over 7 pounds. They are fun to catch, I have great memories and even a few pictures but I don't have any mounted on my wall and don't even care if I catch that size fish so much anymore. They are just another fish. I have just as much with an 8 inch sunfish or 5 lb pike on my ultra light as I do with a 50+ inch muskie. I just love to fish and if I can get enough fish every time I go out to feed my family than that is a bonus that I will gladly take.

Again, there is nothing wrong with eating fish. It is high in protein, proven to make you smarter and even healthier than most other meats. Condemning those who bring fish home to eat should not be what this community is about. I view bounty as a community of fisherman who are patient, compassionate and understanding. As a community of understanding it is our responsibility to embrace all members and help to educate each other to ensure the future of both the sport and this wonderful community.

Bigeyes

FishSlayer83
FishSlayer83

Washington,US

Posted Wed May 6, 2009 11:23 am
Re: CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!
I agree with floyd if the tournament is a catch and release contest and the pictures are obviously not on the water. Those pictures should not count. Keeping fish is your own thing but I would think that most of these tournament anglers would respect the game. The only fish that I keep are salmon. I live in WA and well salmon are Eating fish, bass on the other hand Game fish.

"Be patient and calm - for no one can catch fish in anger." - Herbert Hoover

Walleyewonder
Walleyewonder

Ontario,CA

Posted Thu May 7, 2009 5:44 am
Re: CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!
Guys, I keep and eat bass its one of my favorite fish and tastes great!
But the lakes I fish are so heavily populated with bass....keeping one or two for the pan isnt causing any harm to their population. I release the giants but keep fish under 4 lbs sometimes.
Maybe the fisheries are different here in Canada.
Jratthelake
Jratthelake

Ontario,CA

Posted Thu May 7, 2009 6:56 am
Re: CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!
There is certainly nothing wrong with eating fish, but like you said, release the big girls and eat the most most abundunt part of the fishery, the smaller to average size fish. We dont eat bass on Lake of the Woods because they are slow growing and more of a bonus fish for us. Walleyes are the main attraction and perch are plentifull so we have choices. Lake of the Woods is full of 13 to 17 inch Walleyes so those are the ones we eat, pretty hard to justify killing a 20 or 22 inch walleye when you can eat 2 14 inchers. If you like to eat fish you eat what is available in your area but one thing that works no matter where you are is selective harvest. Have your cake

Wayne Papp JR http://www.witchbay.com/fishrpt.htm

LooseDragMcgoo
LooseDragMcgoo

Ontario,CA

Posted Thu May 7, 2009 7:29 am
Re: CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!
Get a copy of your fish consumption guide for your province, it tells you what is good and what is bad...... Big Salmon are loaded with mercury and compared to a larger bass both hold alot of mercury compared to smaller younger fish...... MMMMMM 17" coldwater walleyes!!!!
Mike :)

Better to be loose then tight!

freshwaterphi
freshwaterphi

Quebec,CA

Posted Thu May 7, 2009 10:45 am
Re: CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!
Smaller fish taste a lot better and are less polluted. I prefer to eat walleyes from 14" to 16", pike in the 4 lbs range, bass between 2 - 3.5 lbs. When fishing the more polluted waters of the St Lawrence and it's tributaries, eating 1 lb of fillets (2 sevings) will put you at your total fish consumption limit for 1 month.

For that reason, I keep my bag limits of those species whenever I get to fish the clean / pristine waters of remote mountain lakes. I fillet and freeze them on the spot, they'll keep for up to year in the freezer if you leave the skin on.

Freshwaterphil.com

Hollaway
Hollaway

Texas,US

Posted Sat May 30, 2009 11:42 am
Re: CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!
I have always been Catch-and-Release with bass. To each his own I guess. I have a cousin that ALWAYS keeps his. It ticks me off, but thats just him. I have only kept bass one time, well, 2 days in a row. They were good eat'n at the time. We went through hurricane Ike last year and were without power for 2 weeks, after we ran out of our own food the MRE's were starting to get old so we went fishing and caught a TON of bass. Ate em. Don't care if that makes anybody mad or not. I think I had an excuse for it. Ha! Anyway, everthing is back to normal now so it's back to catch and release.

Hollaway

Gerrard
Gerrard

Arkansas,US

Posted Thu Jul 2, 2009 8:13 am
Re: CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!
Well I live in Arkansas and here we are really big on being the natural state. We have great fishing and hunting here. But as everyone probably already knows is that Arkansas is probably one of the poorest states in the US and alot of people feed their families by fishing and hunting. But on the flip side Arkansas also has alot of hatcheries where they raise all breeds of fish to include LMB and release them in the public water ways. The state of Arkansas also transports large numbers of fish to other states to be released in public water ways. So if your eating what you catch and it is not going to waste, happy eating, if you are catching and releasing , happy fishing.

Hillbilly Fisherman

BiteMe
BiteMe

Florida,US

Posted Fri Jul 3, 2009 2:33 pm
Re: CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!
Too much Talkin and not enough Fishin'

Focus your energy on the next win!

Certain fish are meant to be eaten.. Its a way of life.
Respect all species.
as for LMB only if they die accidentally or if they are abundant!

Damon Coppola, VP- WrapThisInk.com

RayC
RayC

New York,US

Posted Thu Jul 23, 2009 7:10 am
Re: CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!
I catch and release all fish!!!

Ray

Delawarebass
Delawarebass

Delaware,US

Posted Thu Jul 23, 2009 11:17 am
Re: CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!
I guess you don't live in Japan right??? ROTFL

Northeast Bass Fishing For Trophy Bass

FloridaBassNut
FloridaBassNut

Florida,US

Posted Thu Jul 23, 2009 11:38 am
Re: Re: CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!
lmao. Bass are never an invasive species!

One more thing to look at is where the person lives. I take a lot of pictures from my house, which is within casting distance of the lake. They all get released as soon as the pic is taken.

Also, here in Florida a large bass has very few non-human predators. Some lakes (like Kerr) have signs stating "Please keep all bass caught [insert size limit]". I do my best to return all bass alive and well, especially trophies, but a little thinning is sometimes needed. Please note I'm not making an excuse for people that keep everything they catch, but that's why slot limits are in place and it's illegal to keep more bass than allowed. I personally release all bass and never bed fish.

Florida Bass Network Founder and Angler - www.floridabassnetwork.com

donwally
donwally

California,US

Posted Thu Jul 23, 2009 12:59 pm
Re: CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!
i hate selfish people who dont catch and release they should be shot!!!

seven pounder

jdaddy
jdaddy

North Carolina,US

Posted Sat Aug 1, 2009 3:53 pm
Re: Re: CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!
donwally - " i hate selfish people who dont catch and release they should be shot!!!"


I hope you not serious dude.

Alon D

freshwaterphi
freshwaterphi

Quebec,CA

Posted Sat Aug 1, 2009 7:19 pm
Re: Re: CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!
I guess you hate fish stores and supermarkets too.
WTF is the difference to you if some anglers like to keep some of what they catch?
Are fish more important than chickens or beef?
Would you like to shoot all butchers as well?
Seeing that you think fish are more important than people, are you affiliated with peta?

Freshwaterphil.com

Delawarebass
Delawarebass

Delaware,US

Posted Thu Jul 23, 2009 2:18 pm
Re: CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!
LOL Yeah Shoot everybody who disagrees with you. I hope thats a joke. If it is, its funny, if its not, read the post above and move on.

Northeast Bass Fishing For Trophy Bass

zachatree
zachatree

Pennsylvania,US

Posted Fri Jul 31, 2009 7:44 pm
Re: CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!
interesting.

funny reading over all these bass fisherman talking about how they don't like seeing when there target species gets killed.


try seeing bowfisherman with dozens, sometimes hundreds of your target species.

its crummy, but deal with it.

Zach Hoffa I cant cpell

Gmoney
Gmoney

Texas,US

Posted Sat Aug 1, 2009 3:40 pm
Re: CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!
I have to agree with that;You should see the looks I get when I'm releasing a 14"or larger Crappie.......I only have so much freezer space...lol.I usually keep the 10 and 11 inchers..Snap a pic with those Big mommas and let them go....

Cole

Jratthelake
Jratthelake

Ontario,CA

Posted Sun Aug 2, 2009 4:16 pm
Re: Re: CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!
Nice to see others that will let those Big Crappies go, 11 inches and up go back.

Wayne Papp JR http://www.witchbay.com/fishrpt.htm

KEVERS
KEVERS

Ontario,CA

Posted Sat Aug 1, 2009 5:05 pm
Re: CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!
Bass are a dime a dozen, eat the small ones, and let the brood stock go.
floyd
floyd

Florida,US

Posted Sun Aug 2, 2009 7:57 am
Re: Re: CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!
Yea- goes good with collard greens, chitlins and a little watermellon for dessert. Eat up homies!

floyd

troller8
troller8

Quebec,CA

Posted Sun Aug 2, 2009 9:47 am
Re: CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!
I tagged over 1100 muskies from 1994 to 1997 for the government. 84% were recaptured, some up to 12 times, some in the same day. 12 of those fish had internal radios and were recaptured multiple times by different anglers over the 3 year life of the radio transmitter battery. These are Muskies that are very difficult to handle and release. FISH HAVE NO CHANCE OF SURVIVING IF YOU DON'T PUT THEM BACK.

Musky

Richard
Richard

Other,CA

Posted Sun Aug 2, 2009 10:01 am
Re: CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!
Everyone has an opinion… here’s Switzerland’s.

Catch and Release Fishing Banned in Switzerland

“The new legislation states that fish caught should be killed immediately following their capture, with a sharp blow to the head from a blunt instrument”.
http://sports.espn.go.com/outdoors/fishing/news/story?id=3388363

“Sharp blow to the head”… yet releasing them is against the law. Given the choice what would the fish choose? Being eaten or released?

Eating fish is fine in my view. I will say this, the passion that pours profusely from the pores of serious anglers is the resource's best ally.

If you’re going to practice catch and release please take the time to learn proper handling techniques!

R

DaleHollowTroller
DaleHollowTroller

Tennessee,US

Posted Mon Aug 3, 2009 6:45 am
Re: CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!
I personally have an 8 lb bow in my fridge soaking in Teriyaki and a couple of channel cats in buttermilk.......Which will I eat first?????On the other hand I released over 50 lbs of small mouth this week end.If someone wants to shoot me for that I say bring it on,I've got an M1......Dave

http://www.trolldhl.com

rainbow
rainbow

Manitoba,CA

Posted Mon Aug 3, 2009 11:55 am
Re: CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!
Selective Harvest , There is nothing wrong with eating the odd fish , Up north Bass are very slow growing [Never killed a bass ] but pike walleye 18" + under + perch are abundant ] Catfish have special regs to protect the spawners Trout are stocked Put + take . I love having the odd fishfry but I release more than I take . Good fishing out there . Cheers BK

Take your Kids fishing .. They grow up!! Fast !!!!

KEVERS
KEVERS

Ontario,CA

Posted Mon Aug 3, 2009 6:45 pm
Re: CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!
Largemouth i never eat, but smallmouth which are a dime a dozen in my parts, and are in lakes where they do not even belong, i will keep and eat. Selective harvest is the key words. Release the brood stock and keep the cookie cutters. My Grandpa is 98 yrs old, and he will take smallies over brookies, walleye, lakers, pike and perch anyday. So i make sure i keep some for the old boy and myself.
zachatree
zachatree

Pennsylvania,US

Posted Mon Aug 3, 2009 7:17 pm
Re: CATCH AND RELEASE???? NOT!
at least when people kill bass they eat them..

when people bow fish carp an have trash bags of dead fish... there lucky if they get used as fertilizer. that thing that sucks is there trophy size carp...


dont kill big carp, dont eat bass.... like talapia? eat small carp!!!!!!!!!! :D

Zach Hoffa I cant cpell

Bookmark and Share

Nov 7,2009

foggy day

Nov 7,2009

baby bass

Nov 7,2009

baby bass

Nov 7,2009

bass